Well, I am having a good month. As I mentioned in my last post, some of my work was accepted in a show in MN. Earlier this week I entered some more drawings in a local juried show and one was accepted. So I actually have work in two shows that are opening this weekend, and this is the first time I have ever been able to say THAT.
Lest you think I am resting on my laurels, however, I did take the time to assess my progress on my 2014 goal of 750 hours. As the end of the first quarter, March 31 is a benchmark date for many businesses and so it seems like a good time to revisit those New Year’s Resolutions. I had a somewhat rocky start to the year and as of mid-February I was definitely behind schedule. However, I put in extra time to make up for that, and have gotten myself caught up again.
So as of March 31, 2014 (thirteen weeks into the new year), my progress stands as follows:
Studio time- 133 hours, which is three hours over the goal of 10 hours a week.
Marketing etc- 64 hours, or one hour short of the goal of 5 hours a week.
I’ve also added a new category of “supporting tasks,” for things like framing, purchasing art supplies, and research, which don’t really count as hands-on time in either category. I have racked up an additional 36 hours there, for a grand total of 233 hours in 2014.
Again, I know this kind of time keeping seems obsessive, but it works! It’s a lot like writing down all of your calories(don’t get me started) so you have a true picture of what’s going on-no room for excuses. And, for the moment at least, it seems to be paying off.
As for me…. looking back, I see I have only applied to two shows so far this year, so I need to work on that. (Although I like my current acceptance rate as it is. J)
P.S. Here are the drawings …
This year, I am proud to say that I am a Regional Artist Project Grant recipient, courtesy of the Arts & Science Council of Mecklenburg County and NC Arts Council. I wrote the proposal in September 2013 and was approved. So what does this mean?
Applicants to this grant write a proposal asking for funding-usually for equipment or travel/study costs-and make a specific statement about what they will do with the funds and how their growth as artists will be impacted. My proposal was “To purchase an entry level DLSR camera and intervalometer to produce time lapse videos documenting the creation of large scale drawings.” For a couple of years I have been experimenting with photographing and posting work-in-progress pictures. These pictures have been met with interest and support from those who have seen them. (Thanks!)
For a while I have been intrigued with the idea of taking this process to the next level. About ten years ago a friend told me, “You are obsessed with accounting for your time.” Given the premise of this entire blog, I guess she was right!
So the “anticipated outcome” of my project is to produce 3-5 of these videos. I had a great week in the studio creating a trial video. I still have a pretty steep learning curve: finding the best camera settings and position, getting the math right(I took way too few frames for the first half of the project), learning not to kick the tripod out of place midway through the process, and I have a long way to go in learning the production phase. In this particular video, I would like to figure out how to begin and end the video with a longer pause on those frames, and maybe add some text and audio.
That being said, I couldn’t wait to post it! So here it is, in all its amateurish glory. Hope you enjoy it.
For the past two years or so, I have been making large scale drawings on fairly inexpensive paper that comes on a 60 inch wide roll.
It has not been a bad paper to work with, but due to the size of these drawings, I would like to use something with a little more body; more impervious to denting and damage during transport and storage, and that might possibly be able to hang unframed. Since some of the higher quality papers can run about $200 per roll, I decided to experiment before investing
Aside from a heavier body, the main characteristics I am looking for are:
I initially loved the feel of this paper. It is thick and velvety, almost fleshy. However, on this complex drawing, I definitely did some erasing, and I found that even minimal erasing with a soft, kneaded eraser really mars the surface of the paper, pulling up little rolls of lint. The subsequent marks on the erased patches have a different texture, and you can forget about erasing a second time. Love affair over. We are still friends, though. I have used it for printmaking, and maybe if I go back to my no-erasing rule, I will try it again.
Here are my results:
Fabriano Artistico (140 lb.)
This was the first flag drawing and my least favorite paper. To begin with, I had trouble making very light marks-one of the keys to avoiding erasing. The bigger problem, however, was the laid pattern. I don’t mind texture, but this laid pattern creates a pronounced and geometric pattern of dots. This is particularly bothersome in the lightly shaded areas, such as the shadows in the white stripes.
|Detail of laid pattern|
Aside from erasing, the other thing I don’t like doing is “shading” using a blending stump or (yuck) fingers. I know some artists do it nicely but I prefer to obtain a range of shades through varying the pressure used. In this case I ended up breaking my own rule and using mineral spirits to try to distribute the charcoal more evenly. It sort of worked but not really to my satisfaction. This paper also did not allow me to build up the darks as much as I would have liked, despite the texture of the surface. It did accept erasing with better results than the BFK Rives. It may be that the laid pattern is useful for a specific subject matter, but it doesn’t appeal to me currently. The back side has the same texture. I wish I did like working with this paper because it is the widest (59 inches) I have seen in higher quality papers.
Arches Watercolor Paper, Cold Pressed (Bright White, 140 lb.)
This paper is currently my front-runner. It has a noticeable texture but since it is produced from felts rather than mesh, it has a more organic feel than the patterned texture of laid paper. Although erased lines leave a fairly strong ghost, the paper surface stood up to the friction better than some of the others. Apparently this is due to the sizing. The texture did allow for some pretty dark darks and sharp lines, which I liked. As watercolor paper it is meant to be able to stand up to wet media without buckling, so it has a pretty sturdy heft. I would even call it stiff in comparison to some of the others. I think that might give larger drawings a nice presence.
Arches Watercolor Paper, Hot Pressed (Bright White, 140 lb.)
Onward to Flag number three. The nature of hot pressed paper is that it is smoother than cold press. At first I did like the smoother texture and I think it might be nice for someone doing smooth, subtle shading, or working in graphite. Light lines erased well but the surface did abrade a bit. The biggest problem with this paper was the inability to build up darks. After a certain point the surface cannot hold any more charcoal, and the dust simply falls off the paper. Subsequent applications really just push the charcoal around on the surface, rather than sticking in place. I relied heavily on a black pastel to get the darkest areas. The overall look is much softer than the Arches cold press, without the ability to get really crisp lines or dark darks.
Stonehenge (White, 90 lb)
What about you? I would love to hear your experiences with charcoal and paper. Anyone try charcoal on canvas? How did that go?
Happy New Year Everyone,
It is the beginning of the first full “back to work” week of the year. As I mentioned in a previous post, I have been thinking about my studio goal for 2014. Although I am a little nervous about it, I have decided to commit to a total of 750 hours: 500 in the studio and 250 managing marketing and the business side of things. This equals an average of about 15 hours a week-I hope I do it!
I spent the first few days after New Year’s taking stock of 2013 and outlining some preliminary goals for this year. It’s pretty interesting to write out a list of your accomplishments over the year; I recommend you try it.
For me, dedicating 500 hours to art meant that I accomplished the following in 2013:
- Three large scale (5-6 foot) drawings
- Six 22×30″ drawings
- One 30×40 mixed media painting
- A small edition of lithographs based on an older drawing
|“Picked Clean,” 2013. (48×60)|
- Submitted work to six shows (Accepted in two)
- Finally had good photos taken of my work
- Resurrected my website, which had been down for TWO years
- Wrote a grant request to the Arts & Science Council of Mecklenburg County and was selected for funding-more on that later.
- Gave a talk with my mother to a group of art history students at Queens University
- And of course, started this blog
It’s difficult for me to trumpet my own accomplishments like that (an issue I will have to get past if I’m going to market my work seriously), but the important point is that I’m sure I would not have gotten this much done if I hadn’t held myself to this 500 hour goal.
I would have liked to have produced a few more completed pieces this year, so that will be a goal for 2014. On the other hand, some of the marketing tasks, like getting portfolio shots and fixing my website, were long overdue and I am glad they are done.
As for 2014, I have some good preliminary plans and am looking forward to seeing how many goals 750 hours will allow me to accomplish.